Jordan –
☆☆☆
Fallen Heir picks up with Ella and
Easton finishing their senior year at Astor Park Prep, but entirely in Easton's
point of view. I think this story flows best if you've read The Royals books
#1-3, but it's not necessary if you want to skip straight to
Fallen Heir. I was so excited to finally
read Easton's story, but I'm left feeling slightly disappointed. Book #4 seemed
to move so slowly and didn't quite live up to my high hopes for it. The story
just kind of seemed to drag on and then abruptly end. Also, I wish it would've
been in more than just Easton's point of view because I felt like it started to
get a bit repetitive. Erin Watt's
Fallen
Heir just didn't draw me in and keep me interested the same way the
previous books in
The Royals series
did.
Easton Royal has never worried about the consequences of his decisions until he
meets Hartley Wright. She's the only girl to ever turn him down even though he
knows she's attracted to him. However, Easton's determined to win her over.
This is the first time I haven't been completely wowed by Erin Watt and I for
sure thought that I would adore reading Easton's story, but it just didn't do
it for me. Nevertheless, I am excited to read what happens next for the Royal
family!
3.5 stars for
Fallen Heir by Erin
Watt.
Erica –
☆☆☆
3.5 Cliffhanger Stars
In the past 24-hours, I've binge-read all four of The Royals titles. No doubt,
I can attest to the continuity of how well the authors transitioned from Ella
and Reed's narration to Easton's. I wanted to be inside the boy's head, and I'm
not sure I got what I bargained for, to be quite honest.
No matter who is the narrator,
Fallen
Heir has the same frustratingly infectious quality that has the reader
white-knuckling their Kindles, while furiously tapping the pages to see what
happens next. This frustration always has my heart racing as I read, and I love
a book that can do that to me.
Fallen Heir was a roller coaster of
emotional extortion, running the gamut from heartbreak, to frustration and
anger, to surprised laughter at Easton's banter and charm.
So why am I not 5-starring the book like I did
Paper Princess?
Easton is all over the place, which I understand due to his ADHD, upbringing,
and his tragic past. Easton is hurting, having lost his mother to suicide,
feeling he is partially to blame, being the middle child who feels adrift from
the rest of the family, and finding out his hero is actually a villain. Easton
was difficult to read on many levels. I do applaud the authors on the
authenticity of how Easton's mind functioned in chaos.
What I struggled with is the wash-repeat feel of the storyline... What was new
and original in
Paper Princess, and
its two sequels, seems worn and tired in this new story arc.
*Rich, misunderstood bad boy as our hero.
*Poor, abandoned, intelligent, hard-working heroine.
*Love-Hate vibe (which I loved, but it felt forced in
Fallen Heir vs fluid and natural in
Paper Princess)
*Heroine's father is the adult villain of the story.
*The doe-eyed, doormat, spineless, begging ex who’s refusing to let go,
thinking the guy is theirs even if they aren't together anymore (for longer
than a year even, in both cases) and blames the guy because they broke up. Yet
never seem to be bothered as their friends go after the guy. Honey, he doesn't
want you – get over it. You cannot dictate whether or not someone likes you,
and it's not a mark against your self-esteem if they don't. They're not a
possession you can control – if they allow that, what's to like or want if
they're that blank and weak?
*Gaggle of mean girls, one in which
blackmails/extorts/annoys/bullies/overpowers everyone – adults and students
alike, and everyone looks on and their only reactions are to wring their hands
and blink.
*A brother/father/friend's girlfriend is actually 'evil' and using this loved
one, but no one steps in and stops it. Just lets it unfold and exacerbate...
"Not my business"... but it's gonna be.
*Our hero, allowing said mean girl to run herd on him for all of the story,
making him look weak as he self-blames instead of just nipping it in the bud as
it happens.
*Only the 'poor' girls are good, and the rich girls all want more money and
status. All the men are pushovers who just let it happen, then fret as their
world burns at their feet
*The real 'doer' never takes responsibility in the aftermath, while the hero
ends up self-blaming as everyone else blames him too. (Everyone, even Ella,
angry at Easton for shouting how the relationship was fake – it was. Easton was
being honest for once, after he said NO multiple times. I don't believe in
cause and effect. She does what she does, and only she does it. It's not
Easton's fault if she doesn't like the humiliation of everyone finding out she
was a liar – her premeditated actions in the aftermath are her fault, not
Easton's. Just saying. I can't stand that mindset, and Ella bashing Easton over
it, it made it feel as if Ella had a character trait lobotomy now that she's no
longer narrating the story. "But did you apologize?" Excuse me, that
girl is trying to mess with you and everyone you care about, Ella – have you
lost your ever-loving mind, girlfriend? Where did logical, problem-fixer Ella
go? She turned judgmental, instead of actually helping with the problem, and
wrung her hands as their world burned at their feet.)
*Illogical actions/reactions.
*The mother of all cliffhangers times 2.
While I did enjoy the story, tried to empathize and sympathize with Easton as
he torched his own life, the wash-repeat of similar storylines dropped the
entertainment value for me. While the subtle nuances were different, the plot
points were essentially the same.
The book was hyper-focused on Easton, with only cameos here and there, missing
that 'gang' feel of family like the previous books, where they tackled the
issues together and had each other's backs. After all Easton had done for Reed
and Ella, Ella wasn't empathetic, nor helpful, but judgmental and completely
not like Ella at all. Gee, how about a rehab, because we all know telling an
addict no or guilt-tripping him isn't going to 'fix' the issue.
Fallen Heir just didn't work for me.
Separately, I 'got' Easton, and I felt for Hartley, but together they didn't
fit. It felt forced. There is zero romance or relationship building. When they
do come together, it felt out of nowhere and out of context of the situations
they were in and their surroundings.
Honestly, I think the book suffered due to the fact that it was a singular
point of view from Easton's narration. The reader needed to 'hear' Hartley to
connect with her, because she was so cold, reserved, closed-mouthed, refusing
to give the simplest of answers or open up to Easton, we readers didn't get to
'know' Hartley at all. No connection. I'm not knocking her character traits
(I'm a similar type of person) being so reserved, without her point-of-view,
the reader had nothing to go on with Hartley – she was a stranger to us, less
developed of all the characters, because at least they spoke freely to Easton
so we (the reader) could get to know them too. Hartley was an enigma to
readers, so why are we rooting for an Easton and Hartley pairing when we have
nothing invested by Easton's bizarre obsession? The only time the reader
connected with Hartley was through hearsay and eavesdropping on Easton's part.
After stating all that above, I do need to say I'd kill for the next in The
Royals series. I wish I had it right now, because it ended in the mother of all
cliffhangers (times 2), as the authors yet again emotionally extort the reader.
I'm good with that – I thrive on the adrenaline rush as my heart races for what
was revealed/happened in the ending. I just hope the storyline deviates from
this point forward.
Young Adult age-range: 14+ due to mature content, bullying, alcohol abuse,
violence, and adult language.